Federal Vehicle Scrappage Program

[Land Yacht]

This may be semi off topic but I think anyone who likes old cars should be interested. Every so often the government tries to get old cars off the road and out of existance by offering money to the owners to turn them in for destruction. This makes it hard for those of us who enjoy these cars to get ahold of them if current owners have them destroyed rather than sell them to collectors or hobbiests.



One of the best lobby groups that is pro-old car and fights these measures is SEMA.

http://www.sema.org


I encourage everyone who is not already a member to check them out and sign up for their newsletter. The below email came from them. Please contact congress and POLITELY let them now why you oppose this scrappage program, when enough people do this it can be very effective.


John







Oppose Federal Vehicle Scrappage Program

Our efforts to prevent Congress from including a nationwide "Cash for Clunkers" program in the economic stimulus package has been successful – so far.  Thousands of SEMA Action Network (SAN) enthusiasts and SEMA members contacted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in opposition to the plan.  The Speaker's Office informed us that your emails, calls and faxes were received and, thanks to your work, Cash for Clunkers was not included in the economic stimulus package introduced in mid-January in the House of Representatives.  Unfortunately, new legislation (S. 247 and H.R. 520) has been introduced in Congress to create a national vehicle scrappage program which will give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in their "gas guzzlers" to have them crushed.  Lawmakers need to scrap this idea!

Contact Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) Immediately
to Oppose S. 247 and H.R. 520

The so-called "Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Vehicles Act" is Cash for Clunkers with a twist.  Instead of focusing exclusively on older cars, this program would target vehicles with low fuel economy ratings of any model year.  Participants would receive cash vouchers ranging from $2,500 to $4,500 based on the model year and whether the replacement vehicle was a more fuel-efficient new car or used car (MY 2004 or later).  Fuel-efficient is defined as getting at least 25 percent better mileage for the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) target for its class.  The bill sponsors want to scrap up to one million cars a year for at least four years.

There is no evidence that the program would achieve the goal of boosting new car sales or increasing fuel mileage.  Many states have considered scrappage programs in the past as a way to help clean the air or increase mpg, but abandoned the effort because they simply don't work.  The programs are not cost-effective and do not achieve verifiable air quality or fuel economy benefits, but they do have a devastating impact on the many small businesses that market products and services for the scrapped cars.  

____________________________________________________________________

Don't Delay!  Please contact Senator Diane Feinstein and Rep. Henry Waxman today to urge their opposition to S. 247 and H.R. 520.  For those who responded to our first call for action, we need you again, along with everyone else.

Contact Sen. Diane Feinstein to oppose S. 247
• Click here to send an email: (http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.EmailMe)
• Call:  (202) 224-3841
• Fax:  (202) 228-3954

Contact Henry Waxman to oppose HR 520
• Click here to send an email: (http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1313&Itemid=1)
• Call:  (202) 225-2927
• Fax:  (202) 225-2525

____________________________________________________________________

Talking Points

Oppose the Use of U.S. Taxpayer Dollars for Accelerated Vehicle Retirement

I am writing to urge lawmakers not to approve an "accelerated vehicle retirement" program.  This is a misguided attempt to spur car sales and claim that the country's fleet fuel mileage is being improved.


An accelerated vehicle retirement program is flawed since it does not target the "gross polluter," an improperly maintained vehicle of any make or model year that has poor fuel mileage and dramatically more emissions due to poor maintenance.


An accelerated vehicle retirement program is flawed because it does not factor-in how many miles-a-year the collected vehicles are currently being driven.  U.S. taxpayers will be buying rarely-driven second and third vehicles that have minimal impact on overall fuel economy and air pollution.


Any vehicle scrappage program threatens enthusiasts nationwide with the loss of valuable parts and parts-cars for repair, restoration, and customization projects.  An accelerated retirement program will reduce the availability of affordable transportation and repair parts used by low-income drivers.  It will also compete with the Salvation Army, the Purple Heart and other charities that rely on vehicle donations to raise money.


Accelerated vehicle retirement is just one of several "Cash for Clunkers" programs that has been proposed in Congress.  The government should just focus on providing a tax incentive to help sell more fuel-efficient, cleaner cars – new or used.  The government should not become a player in the vehicle scrappage/recycling industry.  We have professionals that have been doing that job very well for the past 100 years.


We hope we can count on you to reject "Accelerated Vehicle Retirement."   Thank you for your consideration on this very important matter.      
Please send a copy of your message to Sen. Feinstein and Rep. Waxman to briand@sema.org.

[Crosley.In.AZ]

As a side bar to the nut jobs in Calliefornia ...  

I read where Calliefornia wants to pass laws on how much  electric power a TV consumes.  This from the same folks that want cars that plug in .....AKA electric automobiles.

They regulate TV power usage , yet they want thousands of electric cars on the road?  Seems to me the electric  cars would hurt the power grid in Calliefornia

[GPster]

As a side bar to the nut jobs in Calliefornia ...  
I read where Calliefornia wants to pass laws on how much  electric power a TV consumes.  This from the same folks that want cars that plug in .....AKA electric automobiles.
They regulate TV power usage , yet they want thousands of electric cars on the road?  Seems to me the electric  cars would hurt the power grid in Calliefornia

They're afraid that people will have nothing better to do than watch television while their cars are charging up. GPster